Libraries, archives,
and museums have more in common than one would think. Each of these institutions has four essential
similarities which compose their core mission.
All three gather information, organize the information collected,
encourage research and, above all, promote the quest for knowledge.
Libraries are the original
“storehouse” for all different types of information. Traditionally, the goal of any library has
been to collect, or rather, to build collections centered on literary works or
texts (i.e. books, journals, newspapers, etc.).
Moreover, these texts are usually
not unique although some libraries do contain unusual or older texts which are
rare or one-of-a-kind. Librarians are
typically concerned with providing informational resources to the masses so
that individuals will acquire the skills to educate themselves. In the past, librarians have been primarily
concerned with building physical resource collections. However, with the advent
of the Digital Revolution, librarians have shifted their position from
“Collectors” to “Data Curators”. This
shift is interesting from an intellectual perspective because, traditionally,
archivists have dealt with the management of data.
In contrast to libraries,
archives and, by extension, archivists have traditionally been concerned with
preserving the records of selected individuals or institutions. Archives collect information that is specific
and usually unique to their specific institution’s mission which usually
concerns a particular individual, topic, or institution. In addition archivists
are generally not attempting to preserve every record they find which is
pertinent to their topic of interest. In
fact, the essential goal of the archivist is to decide what records should be
cast aside. However, currently there
seems to be a convergence between libraries and archives with regard to data
curation. Librarians are no longer
concerned with merely building collections but rather with managing the
information that they collect. Since
libraries are now focusing on information management, the question is whether
they will replace or simply merge with archives. This is something interesting to ponder.
Although,
libraries and archives appear to be converging with regard to data curation, I
seriously doubt that these two valuable institutions will ever entirely become extinct. There will always be a difference between
libraries and archives because their missions are entirely separate from each
other. Yet, that doesn't mean that these
institutions are not subject to change.
The Digital Revolution is changing the ways people perceive and organize
data and those institutions that don't adapt run the risk of becoming
extinct. However, change need not always
be a major undertaking. In fact I would
go so far as to say that the degree to which institutions have to change and adjust
to change really depends on their mission, i.e., the goals they are trying to
achieve.
In regards to the
similarities between museums, archives, and libraries, museums are distinctive
because they possess features of both archives and libraries while
simultaneously being different insofar as they collect material artifacts which
are often both informative and rare or unique.
Museums do collect information, or rather material evidence which
provides information, as do libraries. Yet,
by the same token, they also preserve what they collect like archives. Museums are subject to change, but in a
different way from libraries and archives because they deal with an entirely
different form of information. Whereas libraries
and archives are specifically concerned with collecting data in particular
formats (usually written texts), museums are examining data on a much broader
scale the scope of which is the nature of culture itself. People visit museums for entertainment as
well as for scholarly pursuits. I have
always associated museums with “science fiction”, in the sense that, in many
museums, one is often transported to another time that has long since passed or
yet to come to observe the past or imagine the future. There are, of course, many different types of
museums and not all of them deal with culture or the past (e.g., the Boston
Science Museum). Yet, despite their
differences, there are two underlying themes which are apparent in all museums:
education and exploration. Since the
idea of going to a museum for educational reasons seems obvious, I will confine
my discussion of change in a museum to exploration because that is where I see
opportunities for improvement.
In museums,
"change" coincides with exploration because, in contrast to libraries
and archives, the question is not how to
revise standard practices but, rather, where we (i.e., museums as institutions)
are going. Librarians and archivists
must change their practices to adapt to the times. Librarians are rapidly going from being
collectors of texts to being digital curators while, for archivists, the
materials with which they are dealing are changing from physical objects to
digital objects. However, museums and,
by extension, museum professionals, are concerned with continually novel kinds
of exploration as new types of subjects of study are invented and new types of
material culture are created. Through the
continuing exploration of museum contents and the designing of new exhibits,
new interpretations of science and culture are continually discovered. Museums do not curate culture or science as
much as they define and help to create them.
Therefore, with regards to the future of LAMS, all I have
say is that I view the “Convergence Phenomena” as a scale measuring the degree
to which each of these institutions have adapted to the times and changed their
missions to do so. On this hypothetical
scale, libraries have changed the most because their mission now includes curating
information in addition to storing it.
Archives have adjusted to managing digital data as paper documents are
becoming increasingly redundant and have altered their mission to include
managing the digital data life cycle.
Finally, although museums now include digital access to their
collections, they continue to collect material artifacts and to curate material
culture to encourage intellectual exploration.
In this sense, they haven’t changed at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment